Proposed Tariffs on Critical Materials May Disrupt U.S. Defense Supply Chain

The Trump administration is contemplating extensive tariffs on essential materials for national defense, such as steel, aluminum, and rare earths, raising concerns among analysts regarding possible delays and heightened costs for military programs. 

Experts suggest that the proposed tariffs, aimed at decreasing U.S. dependence on foreign suppliers and strengthening domestic manufacturing, could inadvertently interfere with defense acquisition.

“It will lead to an increase in prices,” stated Bryan Clark, director of the Center for Defense Concepts and Technology at the Hudson Institute. “An increase in tariffs on materials such as steel used in shipbuilding will impact all suppliers and increase prices overall.”

Clark likened the possible repercussions to the COVID-19 supply chain crisis, which resulted in soaring costs and the reorganization of programs. Certain defense contractors sought extra funding from Congress, whereas others encountered considerable financial setbacks.

Experts indicated that shipbuilding, which depends significantly on steel for constructing Navy vessels like aircraft carriers, may face notable vulnerabilities due to potential cost increases and tariff delays.

The Washington Post reported that the administration's plans involve imposing tariffs on materials such as iron, copper, batteries, and rare earths crucial for military technology, including specialized microelectronics. The measures are based on the administration’s objectives of enhancing national security and bringing the defense supply chain back to domestic sources.

A source familiar with the matter highlighted that timelines and specifics are still to be determined, but defense considerations are pivotal to the tariff strategy. “Defense matters are certainly a factor in this equation,” the source informed Defense News, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

Although the tariffs are designed to strengthen America’s defense supply chain, analysts warn that the resulting ripple effects may surpass the intended advantages, potentially causing increased costs and delays in military system programs.

‍